Fantastic Beasts 3 Reviews: The lingering glances; the regretful reminiscences of a love that could not be; the simmering desire inside the polite setting of an afternoon tea: “Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledoreopening “‘s scene is steamy.
And it’s made much better by the fact that the actors opposite one other; Jude Law and Mads Mikkelsen; are both handsome men who lend a strong screen presence as well as a subtle sense of emotion to this scene.
Then it’s all downhill from there, with a few thrills and entertaining diversions thrown in for good measure.
These “Fantastic Beasts” films are simply awful.
They’re fine, but never genuinely inspiring or enthralling.
In terms of pure fun; this third sequel is an improvement over 2018’s bleak “The Crimes of Grindelwald;” and it’s roughly on a level with the first picture in the series; 2016’s whimsical “Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them.”
They’re all pursuing the dragon of “Harry Potterenormous; “‘s global; once-in-a-generation success; but each new installment in this spinoff franchise serves as a reminder of how useless and inferior they are.
Fantastic Beasts 3 Reviews: Significantly Enhancement?
Due to the misfire of Crimes of Grindelwald, J.K. Rowling’s extra-acidic views, and Johnny Depp’s legal difficulties; this franchise is in danger of burning out long before its original five-film arc is completed.
The third installment, The Secrets of Dumbledore, will almost entirely determine whether Fantastic Beasts disintegrates or rises like a phoenix.
Albus is always there to save the day (or at least make a valiant effort). While The Secrets of Dumbledore is far from perfect; it does better than its immediate predecessor in terms of not leaving a nasty, perplexing aftertaste.
The Franchise Is Revived by a Returning Scribe
The most serious transgression in Crimes of Grindelwald was the neglect to focus the plot on the actual animals.
Instead; it focused on wizard melodrama; culminating in villain Gellert Grindelwald’s (then Depp; now Mads Mikkelsen) stunning revelation that Credence Barebone (Ezra Miller) was a Dumbledore family member — the brother of Albus (Jude Law) and the son of Aberforth (Richard Coyle) to be precise.
That statement didn’t go over well with the public; implying that Rowling’s job as a sole screenwriter was pulling Fantastic Beasts down.
While the Harry Potter author played a minor role in the first two Fantastic Beasts films, she wrote the first two scripts on her own, to mixed reviews.
Thankfully, Crimes of Grindelwald solves the problem by bringing in Steve Kloves, the scribe who worked on every Harry Potter film except Order of the Phoenix.
The Ending of Fantastic Beasts 3: Harry Potter’s Precious Timeline
Fantastic Beasts follows the established Potter timeline for the most part, although this causes difficulty for the series in the climactic battle.
- The timeline of Harry Potter has traditionally been one of the most important and unchangeable components of the series; yet, the finale of Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore appears to put the series’ long-established storyline in peril.
- Building on Rowling’s chronology has been a critical cornerstone for both audiences and filmmakers throughout the main Potter series and the three Fantastic Beasts prequels.
- This complicates the finale of Fantastic Beasts 3, potentially posing an even greater threat to the franchise’s survival than the film’s mediocre box office and critical reception.
- Since the publication of the first Harry Potter book in 1997, Potter lore has been fairly accurate when it comes to significant dates.
- Except for the famed flash-forward sequence in the epilogue, the original Harry Potter series spans the 1990s, beginning in 1991 and ending in 1998 with the conclusion of Deathly Hallows.
- Following in the footsteps of its predecessors, the Fantastic Beasts series was fast to construct its timeline, beginning in 1926.
The Crimes of Grindelwald is set in 1927, followed by the third installment in the series, The Crimes of Grindelwald, set in 1932.
Fantastic Beasts 3 Reviews: Frequently Asked Questions
Why didn’t Johnny Depp reprise his role in Fantastic Beasts 3?
Depp portrayed the character in “Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald,” but was fired from the sequel barely one week into filming.
Following his libel action against The Sun, Warner Bros. asked Depp to leave the film.
Will There Be a Fourth Instalment of Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them?
What’s next, then? It’s unclear whether “Fantastic Beasts” will be able to fulfill its five-film franchise ambitions.
According to insiders, there is currently no screenplay for the fourth installment.
Is Fantastic Beasts 3 the Final Instalment?
The Fantastic Beasts films brought the plot to the big screen, but the franchise’s remaining two chapters are far from certain.
And, given Fantastic Beasts 3’s box office underperformance, when will Warner Bros.